Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 N.E.2d 826 - Pierce v. State

Pierce v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

49 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Richardson v. State · Hicks v. State · Fleener v. State · Thompson v. State · Cutter v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we have long adhered to a series of rules of statutory construction and common law that are often described as double jeopardy, but are not governed by the constitutional test set forth in Richardson.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e have long adhered to a series of rules of statutory construction and common law that are often described as double jeopardy, but are not governed by the constitutional test set forth in Richardson . Among these is the doctrine that where a burglary conviction is elevated to a Class A felony based on the same bodily injury that forms the basis of a Class B robbery conviction, the two cannot stand.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a reasonable possibility that the evidentiary facts used by the fact-finder to establish the essential elements of one offense may also have been used to establish the essential elements of a second challenged offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.