State v. Lorrah’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2017
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bridwell v. United States · Cheley v. Parham · United States v. Mason · State v. Shelby · State v. Gerrish
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A clerical error, as contradistinguished from judicial error, is not 'the deliberate result of the exercise of judicial reasoning and determination.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Sulz · State v. Rodrigues“'that sentence could not have stood in the face of the [statutory] mandate ... calling for minimum mandatory terms of five, ten, or fifteen years and which may be for life”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“To ascertain the clerical nature of the mistake, [appellate clourt[s] will look to the record to harmonize the intent of the court with the written judgment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.