State v. Lactod’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2022
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Davis v. Alaska · Allen v. United States · Lowenfield v. Phelps · Jenkins v. United States · 19 Cal. 3d 835 - People v. Gainer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no prescribed ritual of words indicating whether the language of an Allen charge is coercive.” Id. (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). 10 . In addition, with respect to Cruz’s claim based on Child’s head gesture, we concluded that”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“be a reasonable and proper exercise of the court's power to guide the jury to a fair and impartial verdict,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Harry · State v. Hunt“(1) There were no significant colloquies between the judge and the jury foreman. (2) It is not uncommon for the jury to advise the court that it is deadlocked and, thereafter, agree to a verdict.... [TJhe jury continued to deliberate after receiving the instruction for another hour and fifteen minutes, suggesting that minority jurors did not instantly acquiesce to the majority. (8) The judge did not threaten to or keep the jury deliberating for an unreasonable length of time. (4) The instruction was reasonably within the ABA-recommended standards for verdict-urging instructions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.