761 So. 2d 1055 - Freeman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
261
cited by 261 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 255 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · McCleskey v. Kemp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 261 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“first, whether the alleged omissions are of such magnitude as to constitute a serious error or substantial deficiency falling measurably outside the range of professionally acceptable performance and, second, whether the deficiency in performance compromised the appellate process to such a degree as to undermine confidence in the correctness of the result.”
72 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Douglas v. State · Taylor v. State“The defendant has the burden of alleging a specific, serious omission or overt act upon which the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel can be based.”
37 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Patton v. State · Connor v. State“[A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient.”
34 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.