Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

761 So. 2d 1162

Anderson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2000-06-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 2009

1 state decisions

Relies on 438 So. 2d 1 - Palmer v. State · Bass v. State · Coleman Music & Games v. Burton

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-06-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In 1985, the trial court would have had jurisdiction to consider and grant appellant’s motion filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, challenging the improper stacking of his minimum-mandatory sentences for five counts of robbery with a firearm. See Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983) (courts may not impose consecutive minimum-mandatory sentences when a firearm is used to commit multiple crimes at the same time and place); Moore v. State, 464 So.2d 1296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) (Palmer should be retroactively applied); Bass v. State, 530 So.2d 282 (Fla.1988) (confirming that Palmer applied to sentences imposed prior to Palmer).

¶2AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, VAN NORTWICK and BROWNING, JJ., CONCUR.
/761/so2d/1162 · .json · Public domain