Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 SO2D 361 - Fee v. Usler

Fee v. Usler’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 530 So. 2d 932 - State v. Beeler · 669 So. 2d 1152 - Wilson v. Roseberry · 552 So. 2d 344 - Shea v. Central Diagnostic Services, Inc. · 662 So. 2d 732 - Gielchinsky v. Gielchinsky · 693 So. 2d 666 - Loudermilk v. Loudermilk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an opportunity to be heard should be provided as soon thereafter as possible.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The showing necessary to effectuate a temporary change of custody was explained by this court in Wilson v. Roseberry, 669 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996): In order to prevail on a request for a temporary modification of custody, the moving party must meet the burden of proving that (1) a substantial change in the condition of one or both of the parties has occurred, and (2) the best interests of the child will be promoted by the change. Antonetti v. Amato, 544 So.2d 286, 287 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Our court has explained that in order to conduct a proper inquiry into these two issues, both parties must generally be given the opportunity for a full hearing where the parties and their witnesses are given an opportunity to testify. Vazquez v. Vazquez, 626 So.2d 318, 319 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “After a trial court issues a temporary injunction, a defendant has two options. He may question the lack of prior notice by immediately appealing the injunctive order ... or he may file a motion to dissolve with the trial court. With the latter option notice becomes irrelevant because the defendant is present, and the burden would be on the plaintiff to show that the complaint and supporting affidavits are sufficient to support the injunction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.