Grau v. Branham’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 479 So. 2d 114 - METROPOLITAN PROPERTY v. Chicago Ins. Co. · 740 So. 2d 520 - Jones v. State · 722 So. 2d 177 - Donaldson v. State · 468 So. 2d 908 - Ed Ricke & Sons v. Green by and Through Swan · 467 So. 2d 401 - Trees by & Through Trees v. K-MART
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fundamental error occurs where the error is so extreme that it could not be corrected by an instruction if an objection had been lodged, and that it so damaged the fairness of the trial that the public's interest in our system of justice justifies a new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“As a general rule, relevant evidence is that which tends to prove or disprove a material fact. All relevant evidence is admissible unless its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, or unless otherwise excluded by law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Overall, broad discretion rests with the trial court in matters relating to the admissibility of relevant evidence, and that ruling will not be overturned absent a clear abuse of discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.