Hartman v. Hartman’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 696 So. 2d 697 - Rosen v. Rosen · 271 So. 2d 7 - Belcher v. Belcher · Wright v. Wright · 715 So. 2d 282 - Cervoni v. Cervoni · 556 So. 2d 520 - Fechtel v. Fechtel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the scope and history of the litigation; the duration of the litigation; the merits of the respective positions; whether the litigation is brought or maintained primarily to harass (or whether a defense is raised mainly to frustrate or stall); and the existence and course of prior or pending litigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Vitalis v. Vitalis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.