Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 So. 2d 528 - State v. Owunta

761 So. 2d 528 - State v. Owunta’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on California v. Green · State v. Sanders · 366 So. 2d 1308 - State v. Allien · State v. Cousin · 702 So. 2d 680 - State v. Everidge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “to admit the fact and has failed distinctly to do so,”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The jury found relator guilty on a single count of carnal knowledge, the only count for which the state provided independent corroborating evidence placing relator's car outside the victim's residence on the afternoon of the offense. On appeal, a majority of the court of appeal panel rejected relator's argument that the trial court had improperly curtailed defense efforts to impeach Derrick and Catina, finding that the statements”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “When evidence which is admissible as to one party or for one purpose but not admissible as to another party or for another purpose is admitted, the court, upon request, shall restrict the evidence to its proper scope and instruct the jury accordingly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.