Nguyen v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
23 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 671 So. 2d 647 - Peterson v. State · 475 So. 2d 1136 - Johnson v. State · Morgan v. State · Hitt v. State · 503 So. 2d 281 - Armstead v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the essential facts constituting the offenses charged and shall fully notify the defendant of the nature and cause of the accusation.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“The issue of whether an indictment is fatally defective is an issue of law and deserves a relatively broad standard of review by this Court.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“¶ 11. In Nguyen , the indictment stated: That in Jackson County, Mississippi, on or about December 12, 1997, [Nguyen and Le] did unlawfully, willfully and fe-loniously receive 114 items, including televisions, C.D. players, VCR’s, cameras, tools and microwaves, of the value of two hundred and fifty dollars ($250.00) or more, the personal property of multiple owners, knowing the said property to have been stolen feloniously, contrary to the form of the statute in such cases made and provided, and against the peace and dignity of the State of Mississippi.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Tucker v. State · Veazy v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.