Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 761 So. 2d 95 - State v. Isenogle

761 So. 2d 95 - State v. Isenogle’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2003
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · 433 So. 2d 688 - State v. Smith · 419 So. 2d 475 - State v. Lanclos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “For photographs to be admissible they must first be relevant, that is, they tend to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence. La. C.E. arts. 401 & 402. However, even if relevant, photographs will be excluded if the probative value of the photographs is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues or misleading the jury. La. C.E. art. 403.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.