Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 A2D 20 - In Re Ti. B.

In Re Ti. B.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Upjohn Company v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · United States v. Gouveia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the collateral order doctrine, interlocutory orders are appealable if they (1) conclusively determine a disputed question of law; (2) resolve an important issue separate from the merits of the case; and (3) are effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The legislative policy of confidentiality serves important ends . . . [but] that policy is not absolute and its statutory implementation is not unlimited,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re TH
  3. “the trial court abused its discretion in excluding”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. In Re TH

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.