In Re Ti. B.’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Upjohn Company v. United States · Hoffman v. United States · United States v. Gouveia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the collateral order doctrine, interlocutory orders are appealable if they (1) conclusively determine a disputed question of law; (2) resolve an important issue separate from the merits of the case; and (3) are effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The legislative policy of confidentiality serves important ends . . . [but] that policy is not absolute and its statutory implementation is not unlimited,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re TH“the trial court abused its discretion in excluding”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re TH
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.