In Re Sumner’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 2010
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Moore v. Illinois · New Jersey Department of Corrections v. Nash · City of Los Angeles v. Department of Transportation · In Re Goldsborough
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The principal inquiry is whether the sanction imposed in the other jurisdiction is within the range of what would have been imposed here if the misconduct had occurred here. If so, there is a rebuttable presumption that we will impose the same discipline here. In re Zilberberg, 612 A.2d 832, 834 (D.C.1992). Where a respondent has failed to [ ] contest the proceedings in this jurisdiction, he has waived his right to seek to rebut the presumption. In re Berger, 737 A.2d 1033, 1044-45 (D.C.1999); In re Spann, 711 A.2d 1262, 1263-64 (D.C.1998); In re Goldsborough, 654 A.2d 1285, 1287-88 (D.C.1995).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In re Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.