Started Pullets, Inc. v. Gourdine’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.2d 1 · 1985
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably Goenaga v. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation (1995), Ying Jing Gan v. City of New York (1993)
6 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1451 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 301 (Animal Drug Amendments of 1968) · 21 U.S.C. § 343 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 7 U.S.C. § 1621 (Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946)
Relies on Jones v. Rath Packing Co. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Research Automation Corp. · Schaefer v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · Wyler v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to defeat a motion for summary judgment supported by proof of facts that would entitle the movant to judgment as a matter of law, the nonmoving party is required under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) to set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact to be tried. If facts essential to support opposition to the summary judgment motion are not available, the non-moving party may seek a continuance under Rule 56(f) to permit affidavits to be obtained or discovery to be had. He may not, however, rely simply on conclusory statements or on contentions that the affidavits supporting the motion are not credible, or “upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleading,” Fed.R. Civ.P. 56(e).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“upon the mere allegations or denials of the [nonmoving] party's pleading,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.