Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 F.2d 1197 - Glover v. Cole

Glover v. Cole’s Empirical Analysis

762 F.2d 1197 · 1985

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently February 2015 · most notably Hays County Guardian v. Supple (1992), Wolff v. City of Phoenix (1986)

20 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1201985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Grayned v. City of Rockford · Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n · Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]udicial notice is an inappropriate device for remedying a failure of proof.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[P]laintiffs' distribution of literature does not lose first amendment status simply "because the written materials sought to be distributed are sold rather than given away, or because contributions or gifts are solicited in the course of propagating the faith." (citing Heffron, 452 U.S. 640, 647 [ 101 S.Ct. 2559, 2563 , 69 L.Ed.2d 298 ] (1981). Their message may be different, but street corner pamphleteers are in the mold of Thomas Paine. To treat them as mere commercial actors, relegated to a subordinate role in our constitutional scheme, is to deny an essential part of our political history.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] college has a right to preserve the campus for its intended purpose and to protect college students from the pressures of solicitation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.