Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 F.2d 1480 - Tucker v. Kemp

Tucker v. Kemp’s Empirical Analysis

762 F.2d 1480 · 1985

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
9
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

44 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably Coleman v. Brown (1986), Drake v. Kemp (1985)

44 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

4301985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Chapman v. State of California · Gregg v. Georgia · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Berger v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]ne class of information which is particularly relevant to the sentencing decision is the defendant’s previous criminal activity. In addition to previous convictions, it is acceptable to consider evidence of crimes for which a defendant has been indicted but not convicted. Activities for which there has been no charge filed can be considered as well. In general, the relevant inquiry for information at sentencing is whether it is reliable.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an appropriate means of pointing out the possibility of Tucker’s future dangerousness and did not call for a speculative inquiry into prison conditions.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “had no effect on the sentencing decision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.