Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 F.2d 56 - Drazan v. United States

Drazan v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

762 F.2d 56 · 1985

Citation profile

114
cited by 114 later decisions
7
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

56 federal appellate · 21 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 114 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Crawford v. United States (1986), Skwira ex rel. Estate of Skwira v. United States (2003)

56 federal appellate · 21 district · 7 state decisions

42019851990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2401 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675

Relies on United States v. Kubrick · Best Bearings Co. v. United States · Stoleson v. United States · Wollman v. Gross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 114 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When there are two causes of an injury, and only one is the government, the knowledge that is required to set the statute of limitations running is knowledge of the government cause, not just of the other cause.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “begins to run either when the government cause is known or when a reasonably diligent person (in the tort claimant's position) reacting to any suspicious circumstances of which he might have been aware would have discovered the government cause-whichever comes first.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “mailing is not presenting; there must be receipt”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.