United States v. Stanert’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.2d 775 · 1985
Citation profile
177 federal appellate · 10 district · 20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 299 later decisions — most recently February 2024 · most notably United States v. Castillo (1988), United States v. Ramos (1991)
177 federal appellate · 10 district · 20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Franks v. Delaware · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 299 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a substantial showing that the affiant intentionally or recklessly omitted facts required to prevent technically true statements in the affidavit from being misleading”
21 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the affidavit purged of its falsities would not be sufficient to support a finding of probable cause.”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“given all the circumstances set forth in the affidavit”
13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.