United States v. Patel’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.2d 784 · 1985
Citation profile
46 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Castillo (1988), United States v. Gray (1989)
46 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1426 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 545 · 19 U.S.C. § 1202 · 19 U.S.C. § 1356A · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1918
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Glasser v. United States · In the Matter of Samuel Winship · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. · Lawn v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in the circumstances of the trial as a whole, ... [it was not] so prejudicial that [it] likely influenced the jury adversely to the defendant and deprived the defendant of a fair trial.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A conviction generally must be reversed if the jury was permitted to convict the defendant on a theory not presented to the Grand Jury or contained in the indictment.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“There shall be levied, collected, and paid upon all articles coming into the United States from any of its insular possessions ... the rates of duty which are required to be levied, collected, apd paid upon like articles imported from foreign countries; except that all articles the growth or product of any such possession, or manufactured or produced in any such possession from materials the growth, product, or manufacture of any such possession or of the United States, or of both, which do not contain foreign materials to the value of more than 50 per centum of their total value ... shall be admitted free of duty upon compliance with such regulations as to proof of origin as many be prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury [emphasis added].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.