Johnson v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.3d 1362 · 2014
Citation profile
10 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 1155 · 38 U.S.C. § 7292
Relies on Auer v. Robbins · Christensen v. Harris County · Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co. · Brown v. Gardner · Henderson v. Shinseki
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an extra-schedular evaluation commensurate with the average impairment of earning capacity due exclusively to the disability .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“'[t]o accord justice . . . to the exceptional case where the schedular evaluations are found to be inadequate.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“adopt and apply a schedule of ratings of reductions in earning capacity from ... [a] combination of injuries.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.