Dawkins v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.3d 247 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 8 U.S.C. § 110 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Skidmore v. Swift & Co. · Lin Zhong v. United States Department of Justice · United States v. Rodriquez · United States v. Pacheco · Almeida v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“term of imprisonment ...is deemed to include the period of incarceration or confinement ordered by a court of law regardless of any suspension of the imposition or execution of that imprisonment or sentence in whole or in part.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“for purposes of that designation as an aggravated felon, it is immaterial whether the sentence is suspended,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a crime of violence ... for which the term of imprisonment [is] at least one year.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.