Griswold v. Coventry First LLC’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Because we are satisfied that the Supreme Court’s decision in Arthur Andersen did not overrule Third Circuit decisions consistent with relevant state law contract principles, we may rely on our prior decisions so long as they do not conflict with [the applicable] state law principles.”). 7 . One might argue that we announced a more restrictive rule in Bouriez v. Carnegie Mellon University, 359 F.3d 292 , 295 (3d Cir.2004), when we stated that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Flintkote Co. v. Aviva PLC

2. “courts have bound a signatory to arbitrate with a non-signatory “at the non-signatory’s insistence because of ‘the close relationship between the entities involved, as well as the relationship- of the alleged wrongs to the non [^signatory's obligations and duties in the contract ... and [the fact that] the claims were intimately founded in and intertwined with the underlying contract obligations.’ ””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Torres v. Cleannet, U.S.A., Inc.

3. “[s]till, a non-signatory may be bound by an arbitration agreement if 'traditional principles' of state law allow a contract to be enforced by or against nonparties to the contract.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 362 F. Supp. 3d 255 - In re Rotavirus Vaccines Antitrust Litig.