Dwyer v. Cappell’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.3d 275 · 2014
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 528 (§ 229 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Central Hudson Gas Electric Corporation v. Public Service Commission of New York · Bates v. State Bar of Arizona · Gitlow v. People of the State of New York · Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp. · Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of Ohio
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“type of restriction-an outright ban on advertising ...-[that] would properly be analyzed under the heightened Central Hudson standard of scrutiny.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“stating that the recognizing agency is not affiliated with or sanctioned by the state or federal government,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“requirements for recognition, including ... education, experience, and testing,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.