Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 F.3d 419 - Jacuzzi v. Pimienta

Jacuzzi v. Pimienta’s Empirical Analysis

762 F.3d 419 · 2014

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Schlesinger v. Councilman · New Orleans & Gulf Coast Railway Co. v. Barrois · Broadcast Music, Inc. v. M.T.S. Enterprises, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any judgment may be collaterally attacked if it is void for lack of jurisdiction,”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “void for lack of jurisdiction ... [a] defendant is always free to ignore the judicial proceedings ... and then challenge that judgment on jurisdictional grounds in a collateral proceeding.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[o]n what grounds that collateral attack is made determines whether there is federal-question jurisdiction. Federal courts have federal-question jurisdiction to entertain collateral attacks on military tribunals- which, like bankruptcy courts, are Article I courts -for lack of jurisdiction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.