Hahn v. Walsh’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.3d 617 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 2072
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show[ ] that there was a 'series of unconstitutional acts from which it may be inferred that the [sheriff] knew [correctional center] officers were violating the constitutional rights of [correctional center] inmates and did nothing”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“do not show that [sheriff] was aware of any risk posed by [his] policies or that [sheriff] failed to take appropriate steps to protect [decedent]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“If there is no conflict, then our inquiry ends because there is no need to displace any rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.