Experience Hendrix L.L.C. v. Hendrixlicensing.com Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.3d 829 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (§ 35 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act))
Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Allstate Insurance v. Hague · 122 Wash. 2d 299 - Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp. · Gallo Winery v. Gallo Cattle Company · American Trucking Associations, Inc. v. Michigan Public Service Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if the verdict is contrary to the clear weight of the evidence, is based upon false or perjurious evidence, or to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Ultimately, the district court can grant a new trial under Rule 59 on any ground necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Thomas v. Cannon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.