Coons v. Lew’s Empirical Analysis
762 F.3d 891 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2021
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 5000A · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1395K (§ 1832 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1396A (§ 1902 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Buckley v. Valeo · Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey · Washington v. Glucksberg · Whalen v. Roe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]e have repeatedly reiterated that threatened injury must be certainly impending to constitute injury in fact, and that allegations of possible future injury are not sufficient.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In that context, 'ripeness can be characterized as standing on a timeline,' and the analysis for both standing and ripeness is essentially the same.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.