Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

762 N.E.2d 1243

Oxley v. Matillo

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2002

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 2002-02-22

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2004

1 state decisions

Relies on Ray-Hayes v. HEINAMANN. · Oxley v. Matillo

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-02-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 ORDER

¶2 Appellee, Vicki S. Matillo, by counsel, files an "Appellee's Petition to Transfer." *1244 The opinion of the is found at Oxley v. Matillo, 747 N.E.2d 1179 (Ind.Ct.App.2001).

¶3 In light of this Court's decision in Ray-Hayes v. Heinamann, 760 N.E.2d 172 (Ind.2002), this Court GRANTS the Petition to Transfer, thereby vacating the opinion of the Court of Appeals, see Appellate Rule 58(A), and AFFIRMS the trial court's dismissal of this action.

All Justices concur, except for DICKSON, J., who dissents without opinion.
/762/ne2d/1243 · .json · Public domain