Roydes v. Cappy’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
December 2014
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Ahuja v. Lynco Ltd. Medical Research · Froelich v. Clark · Fields v. Fields · Turpen v. Turpen · Whalen v. Whalen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Work-related child care expense is an income-producing expense of the parent. Presumably, if the family remained intact, the parents would treat child care as a necessary cost of the family attributable to the children when both parents work. Therefore, the expense is one that is incurred for the benefit of the child(ren) which the parents should share.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Cross v. Cross
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.