762 So. 2d 1139 - State v. Bourque’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State Ex Rel. Graffagnino v. King · 436 So. 2d 471 - State v. Sutton · State v. James · State v. Balser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A trial court’s ruling regarding admissibility of evidence should not be disturbed on review, absent manifest error. State v. Robertson, 98-883 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/9/98) ; 723 So.2d 500 . It is well settled that a lay witness may not testify to matters outside his or her personal knowledge. La.Code of Evid. art. 602. A police officer may testify as to matters within his personal knowledge acquired through experience without first qualifying as an expert. State v. Gibson, 97-108 (La.App. 3 Cir. 4/30/97) ; 693 So.2d 286 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.