Coffey v. Block’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 616 So. 2d 1234 - Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc. · 701 So. 2d 1291 - Reeder v. North · 364 So. 2d 928 - Flowers, Inc. v. Rausch · 747 So. 2d 1234 - McCoy v. City of Monroe · 377 So. 2d 1329 - Recherche, Inc. v. Jewelry Jungle, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he peremptive period provided in Subsection A of this Section ....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“As a general rule, the peremptory exception of no cause of action is the correct procedural device for raising the issue of peremption. Dowell v. Hollingsworth, 94-0171 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/22/94), 649 So.2d 65 , writ denied, 95-0573 (La.4/21/95), 653 So.2d 572 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“While the general rule is that peremption exceptions are treated as a no cause of action exception, we decline to hold that every exception raising a peremption claim [ sic ] must be treated as an exception of no cause of action on which no evidence may be taken. When the fraud exception of La. R.S. 9:5605(E) [relating to legal malpractice peremption] is raised in a legal malpractice action, the trier of fact must examine the underlying circumstances to determine if the evidence supports such a claim in a pre-trial hearing on an innominate peremptory exception of peremption, via summary judgment procedure or at the trial on the merits of the claim. If this is treated as an attempted hearing on an innominate peremptory exception of preemption [ sic ], the trial court did not give the parties a full opportunity to litigate the fraud issue. . . . Based on the foregoing, we vacate the judgment sustaining the defendants' exception and dismissing the action as untimely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.