Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 SO2D 220 - Stone v. Hebert

Stone v. Hebert’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sistler v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. · Bergstrom v. Dalkon Shield Trust · Jones v. West · Allison v. United States · 418 So. 2d 493 - Kent v. Gulf States Utilities Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A landowner owes a plaintiff a duty to discover any unreasonably dangerous condition and to either correct the condition or warn of its existence. It is the court's obligation to decide which risks are unreasonable, based upon the facts and circumstances of each case. In determining whether a given condition is unreasonably dangerous, the degree to which the damage may be observed by a potential victim, who may then provide self-protection, is a major factor. Id. (Citations omitted)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.