State v. Warner’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

cited by 80 later decisions

states following

May 2021

most recently cited

77 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably 845 So. 2d 142 - Wilson v. State (2003), 785 So. 2d 1209 - LaMarca v. State (2001)

77 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · Safford v. Warden, State Prison · 728 So. 2d 192 - Davis v. State · State v. Niblack · State v. Wakefield

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[t]o avoid the potential for coercion, a judge must neither state nor imply alternative sentencing possibilities which hinge upon future procedural choices, such as the exercise of a defendant's right to trial.”
17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
e.g. Byrd v. State · Wilson v. State
“to minimize the potential coercive effect on the defendant, to retain the function of the judge as a neutral arbiter, and to preserve the public perception of the judge as an impartial dispenser of justice.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
e.g. Wilson v. State · Giovanni Sairras v. Florida Department of Corrections
“the trial court must not initiate a plea dialogue; rather, at its discretion, it may (but is not required to) participate in such discussions upon request of a party.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
e.g. 809 So. 2d 910 - State v. Chaves-Mendez · 884 So. 2d 535 - Cambridge v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.