Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 SO2D 535 - State v. Jenkins

State v. Jenkins’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Bucolo v. Adkins · 661 So. 2d 353 - Miller v. State · Graddy v. State · Pendergrass v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A nolle prosequi only means that the state is not prepared to go forward with the prosecution of the criminal charge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To meet its burden in a violation of probation proceeding, the state need only demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant committed the subject offense. As that is a lesser standard than is required to prove the criminal charge, the state may still have sufficient evidence to meet its lesser burden.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.