Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 762 SO2D 67 - State v. Perkins

State v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
March 2007
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Boykin v. Alabama · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Dorthey · State v. Weiland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Advice with respect to the defendant's sentencing exposure has never formed part of the Louisiana Supreme Court's core Boykin requirements for the entry of a presumptively valid guilty plea in any case. Such advice was not mandated by statute until the institution of LSA—C.Cr.P. art. 556.1, added by Acts 1997, No. 1061 Sec. 1, effective date, August 15, 1998. Because the trial courts were not required by statute to advise Perkins of his sentencing exposure at the time of the taking of the pleas, he has failed to present affirmative evidence of any procedural irregularity which would have warranted the shift of the burden of proof to the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “any . . . instrumentality, which, in the manner used, is calculated or likely to produce death or great bodily harm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.