Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2008
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Washington v. Texas · 408 So. 2d 1024 - Jent v. State · 674 So. 2d 96 - Geralds v. State · United States v. O'Neill · Magill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) prior due diligence to obtain the witness' [sic] presence; (2) that substantially favorable testimony would have been forthcoming; (3) that the witness was available and willing to testify[;] and (4) that the denial of the continuance [would] cause[] material prejudice.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Watson v. State · Sainte v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.