Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 F.2d 1072 - Brazil v. Giuffrida

Brazil v. Giuffrida’s Empirical Analysis

763 F.2d 1072 · 1985

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
January 2018
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably Wagner v. Director, Federal Emergency Management Agency (1988), Flick v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance (2000)

13 federal appellate · 1 district ·

901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 4001 (Biggert-Waters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012)

Relies on United States Parole Commission v. Geraghty · Lojek v. Thomas · West v. Harris · Hanover Building Materials, Inc. v. Guiffrida · Atlas Pallet, Inc. v. Gallagher

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Since the flood insurance program is a child of Congress, conceived to achieve policies which are national in scope, and since the federal government participates extensively in the program both in a supervisory capacity and financially, it is clear that the interest in uniformity of decision present in this case mandates the application of federal law.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “draw[ ] upon standard insurance law principles”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Congress did not intend to abrogate standard insurance law principles.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.