Jackson v. Robertson’s Empirical Analysis
763 F.2d 1176 · 1985
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2000
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 30 U.S.C. § 28 · 43 U.S.C. § 1744
Relies on United States v. Locke · Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co. · Turner v. Sawyer · Elder v. Horseshoe Mining & Milling Co. · Lindeke v. Associates Realty Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“30 U.S.C. § 28 requires that a delinquent co-owner receive actual notice (or by publication). Actual written notice for purposes of the statute means that the delinquent co-owner has full and actual knowledge of every fact required by the statute to be given in the notice— Courts look to the form and content of the notice, provided to determine whether the delinquent co-owner "was given the opportunity to contribute his proportionate share of the assessment work_””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cornwall v. Baird“[T]he burden of proof . . . is upon the defendant as to all affirmative defenses which he sets up . . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.