Grand Jury Proceedings: Samuelson Grand Jury Proceedings: Samuelson’s Empirical Analysis
763 F.2d 321 · 1985
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently July 2024
6 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1826
Relies on Kastigar v. United States · Marchetti v. United States · Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor · Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest · Spevack v. Klein
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the possibility of prosecution alone removes the risk of such from the realm of the imaginary and speculative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“which was not applicable to the time [Samuelson] was serving for his prior convictions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Samuelson v. Gasele
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.