Kiendra v. Hadden’s Empirical Analysis
763 F.2d 69 · 1985
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably Thomas v. Brewer (1991), United States v. Currier (1987)
14 federal appellate · 4 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Simopoulos v. Virginia · White v. Pearlman · Smith v. Swope · Hopper v. United States Parole Commission · United States v. Croft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“terms of the IADA apply only when a person is serving a prison term and a detainer from another jurisdiction has been lodged against the prisoner on the basis of `any untried indictment, information, or complaint,'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The least to which a prisoner is entitled is the execution of the sentence of the court to whose judgment he is duly subject. If a ministerial officer, such as a marshal, charged with the duty to execute the court’s orders, fails to carry out such orders, that failure cannot be charged up against the prisoner. The prisoner is entitled to serve his time promptly if such is the judgment imposed, and he must be deemed to be serving it from the date he is ordered to serve it ... Any other holding would give the marshal, a ministerial officer, power more arbitrary and capricious than any now in the law ... Smith, 91 F.2d at 262 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]ince the federal marshals lodged their detainer . . . on the basis of the district court's judgment and order of commitment, and not on an untried matter, the IADA affords . . . no relief,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.