Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 F.2d 975 - Vassar v. Solem

Vassar v. Solem’s Empirical Analysis

763 F.2d 975 · 1985

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

18 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2010

18 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

1001985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Jackson v. Denno · Ake v. Oklahoma · Stafford v. Oklahoma

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]eciding a motion for a new trial is a matter committed to the sound discretion of the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.