Maldonado v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
763 F.3d 155 · 2014
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1357 (§ 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Rochin v. People of California · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty · United States v. Janis · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Lopez-Mendoza
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A petitioner must first provide an affidavit that, taken as true, could support a basis for excluding the evidence. If the affidavit is sufficient, the petitioner is entitled to an opportunity to confirm those allegations in an evidentiary hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“may nevertheless qualify as an egregious violation if the stop was based on race (or some other grossly improper consideration)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[s]omething egregious is by nature extreme, rare, and obvious.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.