Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 F.3d 888 - Graber v. Clarke

Graber v. Clarke’s Empirical Analysis

763 F.3d 888 · 2014

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
December 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Garcetti v. Ceballos

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the speech would create problems in maintaining discipline or harmony among co-workers; (2) whether the employment relationship is one in which personal loyalty and confidence are necessary; (3) whether the speech impeded the employee’s ability to perform her responsibilities; (4) the time, place and manner of the speech; (5) the context in which the underlying dispute arose; (6) whether the matter was one on which debate was vital to informed decisionmaking; and (7) whether the speaker should be regarded as a member of the general public.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[a]lthough Graber's speech preceded the suspension, without other evidence linking the two events, we cannot find the suspension was motivated by that speech”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “In the end, the plaintiff must demonstrate that, but for his protected speech, the employer would not have taken the adverse action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.