Doucette v. Morrison County’s Empirical Analysis
763 F.3d 978 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks · International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States · Ricci v. DeStefano · Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs.”). Accordingly, the Court considers only those portions of the record cited by Mears. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(3). . To state a prima facie case of discrimination based upon disparate treatment, Mears must proffer sufficient evidence that (1) she was a member of a protected group; (2) she was qualified to perform her job; (3) she suffered an adverse employment action; and (4) the adverse action”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.