Davidson v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1964 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Brown v. North Carolina · Vazquez v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hether or not plaintiffs signed the subscription agreements after they made their investments does not create a genuine issue of fact since they both acknowledge receiving the subscription agreements prior to investing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Davidson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.