Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 F. Supp. 2d 145 - Gonzalez v. Holder

763 F. Supp. 2d 145 - Gonzalez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
August 2018
most recently cited

8 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406 · 42 U.S.C. § 233 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Kentucky v. Graham · United States v. Mitchell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located; (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the -claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated; or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this section, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to' such action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “generally should not be penalized for court officers' failure ... [to] properly effect[ ] service.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “is not wholly relieved of his obligation to serve the defendants,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.