Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
January 2019
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Colorado v. Connelly · Davis v. United States · New York v. Quarles · Golden Pacific Bancorp v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When enhancing a sentence, a trial court must: (1) identify significant aggravating and mitigating circumstances; (2) state the specific reasons why each circumstance is aggravating or mitigating; and (3) evaluate and balance the mitigating against the aggravating circumstances to determine if the mitigating offset the aggravating circumstances.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Ketchem v. State · Vazquez v. State“Statements that are the product of custodial interrogation prior to the advisement of the Fifth Amendment guarantee against self-incrimination are generally inadmissible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Furnish v. State“I guess I really want a lawyer, but, I mean, I've never done this before so I don't know”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.