Newsom v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1998
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Matlock · Rosene v. United States · Presnell v. Georgia · Johnson v. Oklahoma · Compton v. New Mexico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not agree with appellant that Post requires proof of force before an individual may be convicted of sodomy under Section 886. This Court cannot, through judicial invention, add an element to conduct which is proscribed by statute. However, we may review a statute to determine its constitutionality. (Citation Omitted) Hence, the ruling in Post is limited to the determination that the statute is unconstitutional as applied to consensual, heterosexual acts between adults ...”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hinkle v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.