Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 P2D 488 - Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control Board

Owsichek v. State, Guide Licensing & Control Board’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably In Re Water Use Permit Applications (2000), McDowell v. State (1989)

28 state decisions

13019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hughes v. Oklahoma · Geer v. State of Connecticut · Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois · Illinois Cent Co v. State of Illinois City of Chicago · Metlakatla Indian Community, Annette Islands Reserve v. Egan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]herever occurring in their natural state, fish, wildlife, and waters are reserved to the people for common use.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Laws and regulations governing the use or disposal of natural resources shall apply equally to all persons similarly situated with reference to the subject matter and purpose to be served by the law or regulation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “[t]hese migrating schools of fish, while in inland waters, are the property of the state, held in trust for the benefit of all the state....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.