Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 763 P.2d 810 - State v. Ott

State v. Ott’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Anderson · State v. Ashe · State v. Fontana · State v. Milum · State v. Logan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “engaged in the proscribed conduct because [she] was coerced to do so by the use or threatened imminent use of unlawful physical force upon [her] ..., which force or threatened force a person of reasonable firmness in [her] situation would not have resisted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.